debates

[bryce2320]

[IMG][/IMG]

[Wickedcummins]

[IMG][/IMG]

I LOVE IT

[MoneyPity]

$10 is trivial bet. Doubt what you want but $10.00 is not a bet it is two cups of Starbucks coffee. Obama is a very good communicator even with Uhhh... when not reading a speech and handling of a response off the cuff. Many people use Uhhh while collecting their thoughts including Romney and the richest people in the US. Even Ted Turner has his crutch and a pompadour hairpiece to muffle his Uhhh's...

Back to confidence on President Obama and a second term. $10 is a donation to Goodwill. A wager is at least $100.00 but I would settle for a post from Nobody in size 7 Bold font in dark Red indicating that you were wrong and overconfident in the Dem candidate and the Dem party. If I am surprised by a miracle and President Obama gets a second term I will do the equivelant post in blue stating I was wrong etc..

To those of you who got hit with the hurricane yesterday you have our deepest sympathies and prayers to each and everyone of you.

Thanks skippa for showing my post un-altered. Bummer when it reads as if someone else was the author.

The last time national elections were defered was during the Civil war era. Even though there is no powerin the hurricane affected areas, portable generators could be set up. As long as the votes are not transmitted over a network it would seem to me if they were able acquire generators the next hurdle will be the polling locations and if they are accessible and not underwater. This election should not be postponed. We need changes and we cannot continue to defer them. Dem vs. Rep, Barrack vs. Mitt. Performance, we have seen the results of President Obama vs. an unknown national Leader in Mr Romney. To me can we deal with what we know for another term or do we gamble on our form of government where the house and senate if they do their jobs can they keep Mitt under control Domestically.

It is time to make the right decisions. Let's do it.

And to all a good day and hopefully a prosperous future.

[Iwndr]

Sandy is the best thing that could've happened to Uhhbama, all the news is on the storm and he doesn't have to show up and defend his non record...

[skippabcool]

Iwndr who she is voting for?

[Iwndr]

EXCATLY.. Thats the truth American man Republican man who works for his keep and wants to keep his keep... democrat wants to take people money who work for it so they dont have to work.. Hence the DEMO part of DEMOcrat... Demolish everything till there is nothing..

[Nobody]

EXCATLY.. Thats the truth American man Republican man who works for his keep and wants to keep his keep... democrat wants to take people money who work for it so they dont have to work.. Hence the DEMO part of DEMOcrat... Demolish everything till there is nothing..

This is very far from the truth. If one took the time to see what's presented to the house and senate, one would realize that the BS about "taking from the hard working man and giving to the poor" is nothing more than an uneducated person biased based on total and complete ignorance. Stupid people that mouth off without any effort to see what their representative are doing.

And to Blame the president for all the woes of this economy is the ultimate of ignorance.

[skippabcool]

Yes last election but the same stuff, watch the whole thing - the last statement is classic

[skippabcool]

[skippabcool]

tppcp

[skippabcool]

Title is a little harsh but it is interesting to see why / how people voted

[skippabcool]

[chpthril]

And to Blame the president for all the woes of this economy is the ultimate of ignorance

Ok, thats a fair statement. So it would also be fair to say, based on your statement, that Obama is ignorant, since he has spent the first 3 years of his term blaming Bush for the economy. He also spent two years on the campaign trail before being elected blaming Bush. Cant tell me im wrong and call me names, because im using your own stated logic.

On the flip side, if the President is not at fault, then who was at fault for the economy before Obama took office? Nancy and Harry????

Again, we are using your own logic, so who is to blame?

[91Terminator]

Ok, thats a fair statement. So it would also be fair to say, based on your statement, that Obama is ignorant, since he has spent the first 3 years of his term blaming Bush for the economy. He also spent two years on the campaign trail before being elected blaming Bush. Cant tell me im wrong and call me names, because im using your own stated logic.

On the flip side, if the President is not at fault, then who was at fault for the economy before Obama took office? Nancy and Harry????

Again, we are using your own logic, so who is to blame?

Ha ha I love it hey nobody answer his questions and I dont want to hear a stupid rant about anything answer his questions and his questions only!

[Nobody]

Ha ha I love it hey nobody answer his questions and I dont want to hear a stupid rant about anything answer his questions and his questions only!

Sure....if you could write a fluid sentence, I'll take you up.

And for the rest of the staunch republicans lurking around here.....my day of reckoning will be November 2nd, Republicans vote on the 3rd.