As to the bore centers being wider , what I was saying was with the push rod gone you can get a better valve lay out in the head and you still have some deflection from the liffter to the rocker in an internal cam which is not as precise as OHC , the block is stronger when there is more thickness between clynders , as to the prop , I agree with the apples to apples comparison , however Indmar has been running the GM engines since 1993 and never spec a different prop other then the 1235, I suspect each engine torque tested optimun with those prop specs , as to the rod ratio 3.74 is still a short stroke IMO just like my 1968 vette 427 it had a 3.76 stroke and was high reving motor , and at this point I havent seen any 6.2l ford engine problems , our boat haulers to our dealership have several thousand miles on them with no issues at this time.
I can say this when Nautique ran the Ford GT40 engines and the Excaliber 350 GM in the same years I could tell which engine was in the boat without seeing them , the Ford had much more low end pull and was more solid when I was cutting on my ski, but this is what is good about having a varity of choices everybody can have what they like.
I can say this when Nautique ran the Ford GT40 engines and the Excaliber 350 GM in the same years I could tell which engine was in the boat without seeing them , the Ford had much more low end pull and was more solid when I was cutting on my ski, but this is what is good about having a varity of choices everybody can have what they like.
Comment