Can somebody put one of those in my stocking (or garage)?!?!?!?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cool 2010 RZ2 Factory Pics!
Collapse
X
-
Sure just copy the picture off the web page, go to Walmart, print the image, put the image in your stocking. You could also print it bigger and put in your garage if you like.Originally posted by jbort View PostCan somebody put one of those in my stocking (or garage)?!?!?!?
Of course if you meant the physical boat, well, I can't help.
Ray Thompson
2005 22V
Comment
-
Congrats and welcome to the site
Did you go with the std or Pro ballast?Mikes Liquid Audio: Knowledge Experience Customer Service you can trust-KICKER WetSounds ACME props FlyHigh Custom Ballast Clarion LiquidLumens LEDs Roswell Wave Deflector And More
Comment
-
Inbetween. It is called the surf ballast. It is 1500lbs and the Pro is 2000lbs. What I am told is that the difference is that you loose some ballast in the bow and it is a single sack as opposed to the pro which has a starboard and port half that is controlable in halves by the Tige Touch. In the Surf package that I have you can't pick sides. In the stern, everything should be about the same, all controlable through the touch interface. I didn't go with the pro package because all the fall leaves were done falling off my money tree and had to make some concessions somewhere.Originally posted by chpthril View PostCongrats and welcome to the site
Did you go with the std or Pro ballast?
Comment
-
Yep, the std and surf use the single 400lb U sack up front and the Pro gets 2 400lb sacs. Surf and Pro both get the two 250 tanks in the floor and the two 350 sac in the lockers. You will be good to go with what you have, that boat likes all the weight in the rear on the surf side and none in the front.Originally posted by wallacmc View PostInbetween. It is called the surf ballast. It is 1500lbs and the Pro is 2000lbs. What I am told is that the difference is that you loose some ballast in the bow and it is a single sack as opposed to the pro which has a starboard and port half that is controlable in halves by the Tige Touch. In the Surf package that I have you can't pick sides. In the stern, everything should be about the same, all controlable through the touch interface. I didn't go with the pro package because all the fall leaves were done falling off my money tree and had to make some concessions somewhere.
Cool part is, Tige still uses 2 fill and 2 drain pumps for the single U sac in the bow. So, if someone wanted to upgrade thier std or surf ballast to Pro, all they have to do is pull the U sac, connect the pumps and hoses to the 2 new sacs, reprogram the Tige Touch and roll on. This can also be done when upgrading the std rear ballast to the surf/pro level - add the sacs and pumps, reprogram the TT.Mikes Liquid Audio: Knowledge Experience Customer Service you can trust-KICKER WetSounds ACME props FlyHigh Custom Ballast Clarion LiquidLumens LEDs Roswell Wave Deflector And More
Comment
-
This was my analysis exactly. The dealer I came to the conclusion that for at least my purposes, I didn't need the extra, divided weight in the front. He also assured me that upgrading in the future if necessary was an option, just like you said.Originally posted by chpthril View PostYep, the std and surf use the single 400lb U sack up front and the Pro gets 2 400lb sacs. Surf and Pro both get the two 250 tanks in the floor and the two 350 sac in the lockers. You will be good to go with what you have, that boat likes all the weight in the rear on the surf side and none in the front.
Cool part is, Tige still uses 2 fill and 2 drain pumps for the single U sac in the bow. So, if someone wanted to upgrade thier std or surf ballast to Pro, all they have to do is pull the U sac, connect the pumps and hoses to the 2 new sacs, reprogram the Tige Touch and roll on. This can also be done when upgrading the std rear ballast to the surf/pro level - add the sacs and pumps, reprogram the TT.
Comment
-
I got the 5.7L 343. The RZ2 was the perfect size and after demoing the dealer's 2009, I found the 343 to be plenty; that and as I previously stated, all the leaves had fallen off my money tree. Had I been in the market for the RZ4 I would have seriously considered the 6.0L. I'll say this, that RZ4 is a beast that can handle a huge crew. But I was very impressed with the 2010 RZ2 when ragboy did his review on the surf wake and performance of the vessel here:Originally posted by 3sportboat View Postwhich engine did you get??
http://wake9.com/blogs/blog/tag/2010-tige/
I realized that loosing two feet and all of that weight weren't going to make a huge difference in wake size/shape and therefore wouldn't need the larger engine either. Another thing he said in the review appealed to me. The RZ2 was much more responsive to the ballast than the 24ve he had, so less ballast provided a larger punch. The pics in his review speak for themselves.
Then again, that all might be just a bunch of
Comment

Comment