Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amp/speaker question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dogbert
    replied
    Originally posted by NICKYPOO View Post
    Oh, I'm sure the wife will go for that.
    Don't despair, after the novelty of the first-born wears off, you'll get your pants back.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moki
    replied
    If she is at all like my wife - she won't! Also, I get punished anytime I buy anything new for the boat --New furniture suddenly appears in our house.

    Congrats again on the new baby - we'll be looking for some Nickypoo Jr. surfing pics in a few years.

    Leave a comment:


  • NICKYPOO
    replied
    Originally posted by Moki View Post
    Just stop spending money on diapers and baby food and you have a new amp with 485s! Buy a few washable diapers and a blender
    Oh, I'm sure the wife will go for that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moki
    replied
    No, you can heat the food in a microwave after you blend it

    Leave a comment:


  • dogbert
    replied
    Originally posted by Moki View Post
    Just stop spending money on diapers and baby food and you have a new amp with 485s! Buy a few washable diapers and a blender
    Oh, now that's cold!

    Leave a comment:


  • Moki
    replied
    Just stop spending money on diapers and baby food and you have a new amp with 485s! Buy a few washable diapers and a blender

    Leave a comment:


  • dogbert
    replied
    I still think a dedicated amplifier has to be better than what's in a H/U these days. They're typically a different class of amp and there is a definite difference in quality. Here's a reasonable explanation for the different AMP classes and why it matters to sound. Probably more than you wanted to know, but if you really want to be a geek, go check out Wikipedia.

    Leave a comment:


  • NICKYPOO
    replied
    Originally posted by chpthril View Post
    It would be marginal at best, and if it were me, Im not sure I would go through the hassle of rewiring everything for such a small improvement.
    I hear you cluckin' big chicken. Thanks man.

    Leave a comment:


  • chpthril
    replied
    Originally posted by NICKYPOO View Post
    I got ya there. I'm just wondering if I'll get better power from the amp as opposed to the deck.
    It would be marginal at best, and if it were me, Im not sure I would go through the hassle of rewiring everything for such a small improvement.

    Leave a comment:


  • NICKYPOO
    replied
    Originally posted by chpthril View Post
    In 2ohm mode (2speakers in parallel) the amp will put out 100W+ X 2, but, remember it took 2 drivers to get there, so they will each split that 100W. not get 100W ea.
    I got ya there. I'm just wondering if I'll get better power from the amp as opposed to the deck.

    Leave a comment:


  • chpthril
    replied
    Originally posted by tigesinaus View Post
    he probably would be getting marginally better power running the amp in parallel. hopefully the amp would be 100w RMS by two, which is better than the 50w max which the head unit will most likely be, they are usually no better than 20w a channel RMS for a head unit.

    so the speakers will be getting 50w RMS rather than 20 or so watts RMS from the head unit..

    but i agree, it you have the money to spend, another amp is an attractive option.
    Originally posted by NICKYPOO View Post
    See now that's kind of what I was thinking. I don't have the extra digits to drop on a new amp, I'm just trying to get the best out of what I currently have.

    In 2ohm mode (2speakers in parallel) the amp will put out 100W+ X 2, but, remember it took 2 drivers to get there, so they will each split that 100W. not get 100W ea.

    Leave a comment:


  • NICKYPOO
    replied
    Originally posted by tigesinaus View Post
    he probably would be getting marginally better power running the amp in parallel. hopefully the amp would be 100w RMS by two, which is better than the 50w max which the head unit will most likely be, they are usually no better than 20w a channel RMS for a head unit.

    so the speakers will be getting 50w RMS rather than 20 or so watts RMS from the head unit..

    but i agree, it you have the money to spend, another amp is an attractive option.
    See now that's kind of what I was thinking. I don't have the extra digits to drop on a new amp, I'm just trying to get the best out of what I currently have.

    Leave a comment:


  • dogbert
    replied
    My guess is that the amp would still sound cleaner than the deck. Most H/U don't have great amps in them. The only way you're going to know is to try it. Otherwise, like chpthril said, you may need to get a cheap amp.

    For reference, I'm running 4 speakers on in parallel from my 2 channel Kenwood amp. It's rated at 170x2 @4 Ohm and 250x2 @ 2 Ohm. That means I have 125 W going to each channel, which is still more than the speakers can handle. It's pretty loud, but could be louder if I went to something like Wet Sounds 485 like Moki has.

    Speaking of which, I finally heard the 485 at last weekend's INT competition down at M2 sports lake. All I gotta say was that the speakers mounted to a bar in the back of a pickup were so loud that the riders could hear them better than what was on the boats. It made for good color commentary and riders often took the bait to go bigger.

    Leave a comment:


  • tigesinaus
    replied
    he probably would be getting marginally better power running the amp in parallel. hopefully the amp would be 100w RMS by two, which is better than the 50w max which the head unit will most likely be, they are usually no better than 20w a channel RMS for a head unit.

    so the speakers will be getting 50w RMS rather than 20 or so watts RMS from the head unit..

    but i agree, it you have the money to spend, another amp is an attractive option.

    Leave a comment:


  • NICKYPOO
    replied
    Geez, you're no fun.

    Thanks chpthrl.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X